<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<title>March Vol.32 No.1</title>
<link href="http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13859" rel="alternate"/>
<subtitle/>
<id>http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13859</id>
<updated>2026-05-15T12:49:23Z</updated>
<dc:date>2026-05-15T12:49:23Z</dc:date>
<entry>
<title>Analysing the Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Bootstrapping and Bricolage: A Modified Total Interpretive Structural Modelling and MICMAC Approach</title>
<link href="http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13877" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Singh, Mansi</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Dhir, Sanjay</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Mishra, Harsh</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13877</id>
<updated>2023-05-27T10:03:40Z</updated>
<published>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Analysing the Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Bootstrapping and Bricolage: A Modified Total Interpretive Structural Modelling and MICMAC Approach
Singh, Mansi; Dhir, Sanjay; Mishra, Harsh
This article seeks to systematically identify and model antecedents of entrepreneurial bootstrapping and bricolage to determine and interpret the relationships and hierarchy between them. Entrepreneurial bootstrapping and bricolage are key dynamic capabilities that help entrepreneurs access, accumulate and enhance resources to adapt to scarce business environments. The article employs a modified total interpretive structural modelling analysis to determine hierarchical inter-relationships between the antecedents and a Matrice d’ Impacts Croises Multiplication Applique An Classment analysis to understand their driving and dependence powers. The results highlight that founder characteristics and human capital are placed at the lower levels, making them critical driving elements of the model along with environmental hostility and resource constraints. Entrepreneurial orientation, slack, external financial capital and entrepreneurial frugality are dependent variables, with social capital as a linkage variable. This study will guide entrepreneurs trying to implement resourcefulness behaviours to respond to the coronavirus disease-2019 crisis by prioritising driving antecedents to impact the dependent factors further.
Singh, M., Dhir, S., &amp; Mishra, H. (2023). Analysing the Antecedents of Entrepreneurial Bootstrapping and Bricolage: A Modified Total Interpretive Structural Modelling and MICMAC Approach. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(1), 7–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231159495
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>The Effect of Entrepreneur Attributes on Investment Evaluations in Pitch Competitions</title>
<link href="http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13876" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Lavi, Adi Hoorvitch</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Yaniv, Eyal</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13876</id>
<updated>2023-05-28T05:24:24Z</updated>
<published>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">The Effect of Entrepreneur Attributes on Investment Evaluations in Pitch Competitions
Lavi, Adi Hoorvitch; Yaniv, Eyal
Investment in early-stage ventures entails significant risk and uncertainty; for this reason, most investment pitches do not result in investments. Whereas the literature in entrepreneurial financing indicates that investors rely on their gut feelings, it remains unclear which entrepreneur attributes factor into this type of intuitive judgment. This study presents a holistic model of entrepreneur attributes as they relate to inventors’ evaluation of funding potential. The model is divided into three categories: entrepreneur–investor relational attributes, entrepreneur motivational attributes, and venture performance-influence attributes. The model is then tested on real-time pitch competitions, by analysing data from technology start-up entrepreneurs, psychologist evaluators, and investors. The model is grounded in dual-processing theory and signalling theory. It is hypothesised that investors base their evaluations on their intuitive judgment of the entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurs’ competence, coachability, passion, preparedness, and leadership are shown to be associated with investors’ evaluations of funding potential.
Lavi, A. H., &amp; Yaniv, E. (2023). The Effect of Entrepreneur Attributes on Investment Evaluations in Pitch Competitions. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(1), 39–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231160325
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>An Experimental Investigation of Perceived Differences in Personality and Leadership Attributes of Social Entrepreneurs Compared to for Profit Entrepreneurs and Non-Profit Organisations Leaders</title>
<link href="http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13875" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Kruse, Philipp</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Rosing, Florian</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13875</id>
<updated>2023-05-27T09:09:23Z</updated>
<published>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">An Experimental Investigation of Perceived Differences in Personality and Leadership Attributes of Social Entrepreneurs Compared to for Profit Entrepreneurs and Non-Profit Organisations Leaders
Kruse, Philipp; Rosing, Florian
Social enterprises (SEs) strive for the fulfilment of a social mission based on an elaborated income strategy. Consequently, they are largely conceptualised as hybrid enterprises combining logics of traditional non-profit organisations (NPOs) and for-profit enterprises (FPEs). This is sound on the organisational level; however, it remains unclear to which extent the perception of SE leaders on the personal level mirrors this hybridity as previous studies are limited in scope and methodology. Our work examines perceived personality traits, work-related values, leadership styles and leader attributes of SE leaders compared to FPE and NPO leaders. Using a vignette-based, comprehensive experimental design with a sample of business students (N = 170), we find that whereas notable differences in personality and leadership comparing SE and FPE leaders exist, SE and NPO leaders were perceived as not different. Based on our findings, theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
Kruse, P., &amp; Rosing, F. (2023). An Experimental Investigation of Perceived Differences in Personality and Leadership Attributes of Social Entrepreneurs Compared to for Profit Entrepreneurs and Non-Profit Organisations Leaders. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(1), 75–110. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231160332
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Organisational Propensity to Innovate in a Public-Sector Context</title>
<link href="http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13866" rel="alternate"/>
<author>
<name>Iliashenko, Iuliia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Papagiannis, Fragkoulis</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Gazzola, Patrizia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Cherkas, Nataliia</name>
</author>
<author>
<name>Grechi, Daniele</name>
</author>
<id>http://dspace.ediindia.ac.in:8181/xmlui//handle/123456789/13866</id>
<updated>2023-05-24T16:24:54Z</updated>
<published>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</published>
<summary type="text">Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Organisational Propensity to Innovate in a Public-Sector Context
Iliashenko, Iuliia; Papagiannis, Fragkoulis; Gazzola, Patrizia; Cherkas, Nataliia; Grechi, Daniele
The importance of innovation, in both private and public entrepreneurial fields, is the basis of all companies’ strategic choices. This study examines entrepreneurship and innovation, as well as their dynamic interface in value creation, in the public sector. It explores entrepreneurial determinants for public-sector innovation, as collected from managers and employees involved in the water supply and sewage industries in Ukraine. The data, related to a sample of firms, were obtained from a twofold self-administered survey. Adopting an ordered logistic regression model to analyse the data obtained from a survey, it is found that the entrepreneurial determinants of self-awareness, knowledge-enabling and entrepreneurial orientation positively correlate with fostering innovation process. The findings reveal that entrepreneurial leadership and intrapreneurial self-efficacy are mediating determinants. Finally, the results demonstrate that intrapreneurial self-efficacy has more potential than entrepreneurial leadership to stimulate innovation at the individual level, which has both theoretical and practical implications.
Iliashenko, I., Papagiannis, F., Gazzola, P., Cherkas, N., &amp; Grechi, D. (2023). Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Organisational Propensity to Innovate in a Public-Sector Context. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 32(1), 111–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/09713557231158239
</summary>
<dc:date>2023-05-23T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
</entry>
</feed>
